Two sides to every story and multiple agendas

I wanted to share a couple of recent news articles I thought were excellent in terms of giving a really balanced picture of what is happening in Vietnam.

First off this piece from (Twitter’s very own) Mike Ives.  Government’s seizing land is always going to be an emotive subject but I’ve bemoaned, for some time now, a lack of explanation from the state.  That’s the problem with a state controlled media, sometimes it’s easier to limit coverage than to actually explain. I can’t begin to imagine how much effort it must have taken to bring absolute balance to this piece.

Along the same lines this fantastic piece by Robert Kaplan in The Atlantic offers an incredibly exhaustive overview of modern Vietnam and its diplomatic  role in the region.  Reading both pieces side by side it feels like the balancing act required to run this country is almost impossible to comprehend.

What worked best about both is that they were written with obviously an incredible amount of research and valued facts rather than just  targetting the usual bogeymen.  In contrast, a much briefer example perhaps, but the crow-barred in reference to communist Vietnam in this report of a horrific accident just seemed odd and it’s hard to know what it’s suggesting.

Balance doesn’t make one side right or the other side wrong.  Balance doesn’t make the worst excesses forgivable. But balance does give us the chance to make our own minds up. Just as there two sides to every story, there are also various agendas.


On Vietnam, cams and uninstalling Instagram.

Hanoi on a national holday

It’s been a while since a photo taken with an “proper” camera appeared on this blog, which is a shame really because looking back I’m quite proud of a few of them.

But since I bought a smart phone with a half decent in-built cam I’ve felt less like actually lugging anything else around with me.  There’s more to it than that though.  Living in Hanoi there’s only so many five-on-a-bike, conical hatted ladies and pho stand pics you can take.

I began to equate carrying a camera, not so much with being a tourist but very definitely being an outsider.  That’s not to say that I’m kidding myself that I’m still anything but, however it’s not a fact I want to hammer home.

I also got a little tired of that expat hey we’re all djs, journalists, filmmakers, photographers and multimedia artistes thing.  I’m not a photographer and there are too many good ones (and many many bad ones I’d rather not be bracketed with) for me to claim otherwise.

So that leaves me with the smart phone cam which would be all well and good except Instagram. Back when it was an Apple thing, (I’m an Android man but I prefer an Apple laptop – it’s complicated), I inwardly mocked it as hipster crap.  But, keen to have a play, I downloaded when it became available and now I’m irritatingly hooked.

And now I dislike it more than ever.

I dislike the retro filters that can be applied to everything.  I hate the whole concept of everything looking like your mum and dad’s polaroids. Why must everything be retro?  Even in place where 1977, as one filter is called, wasn’t so much fun.

There’s something very wrong with capturing memories with a computer generated rosy glow and a designed-in fade.  This process used to happen in our heads,  then it happened on photographic paper – now we’re cynical enough to digitise it.

Beyond that I hate the all consuming me-tooness of it that was irritating when it was just Apple but now with Android it’s hit a please-God-make-it-stop critical mass.

But I know that when I’m thinking enough with the Instagram, I’m talking to myself as much as everyone else.

Without Instagram, my phone pics have an even more obvious lack of sharpness  and their washed out colours appear even more bland. It’s like when I used to make mixtapes on a deck with an ultra-fast setting. Afterwards songs played at natural speed seemed lifeless and turgid.

So far though I haven’t been able to stop using Instagram. I dabbled. I was hooked.

But consider this as notice, I’m going cold turkey.

The pic above of national holiday everyone’s-gone-to-country Hanoi is very definitely my last.

I’m uninstalling the app.


The Trouble with Travel Writing

Westake sunset
I don’t think that travel writers visiting where you live and airing an opinion is ever a particularly comfortable experience.

Now of course, it’s not a case of someone arriving followed by a wait while they return home and file copy. The writer, whether pro or wannabe, is likely to be sharing their views from the second they hit WIFI.  In Vietnam there’s a lot of WIFI.

What it means is that without looking especially hard, you can come across reams and reams of live content generated about where you live. In the end very little of it impresses.  Yes it can be mean-spirited to pick holes, but frequently it’s all too easy and that goes for the writers from the quality press just as as much as it does for ambitious young bloggers.

Travel bloggers dreaming of being able to fund an endless holiday, need to be read. In order to be read, even putting aside SEO-thinking, they have to be of use. So instead of actually writing about their travels they write tips for future backpackers. However with limited time in town and limited research resources they Google and cannibalise what they find.

Even their travel writing heroes are not great explorers but great blaggers. Travelling for years fuelled by travel tips churned out and ready to be recycled by the next “nomad”. Sure, it’s not about the destination, it’s the journey.  But increasingly it’s length of journey that’s all important.

For the foodies it means visiting that same bun cha restaurant. While those not wanting to be quite so same same, head for the snake village. Another cliche but it’s something to share on YouTube and if it’s good enough for the telly guys… (please, don’t do it).

Meanwhile at the higher end of the market, “proper” journalists descend on Hanoi as the first stop on their tour. All good except they use the same Google as the rest of us. Worse still with flights and rooms arranged by the same PR company the writers ends up staying in the same places and churning out information from the same fact sheets. Google “Charlie Chaplin” AND “Sofitel Metropole” and you get 11,900 results.

After the Metropole there’s the three other hotels that crop up time and time again in Hoi An, Hue and Ho Chi Minh City. One charges well over $1,000 a night. Not the kind of freebie you’re going to slag off in print – then again, with the PRs having primed the resort management it’s not like they’re going to get anything but preferential treatment anyway.

And when did broadsheet travel writing becoming almost exclusively about luxury?

But perhaps the days of The Great Railway Bizarre are over anyway. It’s not just that everyone’s seen it all already on TV and YouTube but travel writing as Paul Theroux said is about “Jumping to conclusions and generalising. Inventing and recreating places from vagrant glimpses.”

In modern times I think we’re less comfortable generalising about people and we’re less comfortable reading those who still do.

That’s probably no bad thing.

I’m not sure where it goes from here though.  Are travel tips and Instagrammed photos of sun sets all we have left?


So this is Earth Hour? What have you done?

IMAG0912-001

Earth Hour 2012 in Hanoi is between 8.30pm and 9.30pm on Saturday, March 31st.

If you work in the centre of Hanoi you won’t have been able to miss that fact.  What must be hundreds of plastic banners, some spaced just a few feet apart, are everywhere.  They include the logos of sponsor EVN (Vietnam Electricity) and “multi sector corporation”  Tan A Dai Thanh whereas the logo of global organiser WWF is conspicuous by its absence.  Then again WWF might prefer it that way.

Some more background here.    It states:

Vietnam saved 400,000 kWh of electricity, equivalent to 500 million VND in the Earth Hour 2011 campaign. This year’s 60-minute performance is expected to save a larger number of kWh of electricity, presenting a year-on-year increase of 20 per cent.

Shame about all that plastic going into landfill though.

Update: Just noticed this Vietnam specific piece in the Earth Hour Criticisms section of Wiki:

On March 29, one day after Earth Hour 2009, Dân Trí daily newspaper published an article about the other side of Earth Hour. It was concerned that many young people chose to drive around the darkened cities for fun, exhausting petroleum instead of electricity and resulting in long-time traffic jams.

It refers to this piece. It’s in Vietnamese but the pics are worth a look too.

Also see the comment below from Tabitha – who has some more information on WWF’s involvement and potential re-use of the plastic banners.

IMAG0911-001

IMAG0910-001

IMAG0902-002

IMAG0913-001

IMAG0904-001

IMAG0914-001


Vietnam tourism, social media and the Big Bang Boy

“Big Bang” wins big honour

My head has been whirring this week – a mess of thoughts that, hopefully, once down on “paper” will start to make more sense.

First up is Vietnam’s tourism. Trashed by the Huff Post, defended in this laughable piece and with a new slogan launched I wonder just what does work these days. I remember assisting on a bid to brand Newcastle upon Tyne, slogan and all – always with Glasgow’s Miles Better as the good example – but now I’m pretty sure it’s a red herring.

In an age where we can share our travels so easily, being good at marketing isn’t as important as just being good. Vietnam shouldn’t look at ways to rid itself of the reputation for cheating and scamming – instead it actually has to get rid of the cheaters and scammers.

Don’t work out your excuses, reach the point where you no longer have to make them.

We’re less likely to be fooled by glossy mag ads or slogans or tv ads. We just want information. Malaysia Truly Asia may have rammed itself into our subconscious but does all that TV time equal that good a return on what must have been a massive investment?

Is advertising just an easy way to get rid of a budget in a way that the audience is easily measurable even if the effect isn’t? In the old days direct marketing (junk mail) was known to be hated by all but was kept on by marketeers for the exact same reasons.

At work my activities are split between heading the marketing communications for partnership programmes of the engagement and relationship bulding type and the cold hard challenge of sales, targets and all.

The days of leaflets and brochures are largely over but the future for advertising is less clear. If newspapers are not the future then are we better to advertise with Facebook? Or will all advertising never wield the power it once had?

Meanwhile, the picture above is the winning entry in an international art competition run by my employers. The story goes that the Vietnamese child artist spelled Big Ben wrongly but his “Big Bang” pic stole the hearts of judges. We released the story to the press and for some reason it has had legs like no other release I have ever written.

Boy’s mistake wins judge’s hearts. What did he really mean by “Big Bang”? Was he referring to a starter’s pistol, the fireworks of the opening ceremony or even Vietnam’s own breakneck development?   

Probably none of the above and yet this seemingly slight story now has 1,400 results on Google and counting.

Vietnam’s cut and paste journalism, scammers stealing copy for sites earning from Google ads, social media and a nice image – they were enough to see this story reappear time and time again. On Thursday – a month after we released it, it made yet another sizeable piece, this time in VN Express. I can’t imagine how much it would have cost to buy this amount of space and yet we spent literally nothing on it.

So, trying to make sense of all of the above….

We can’t even fool some of the population some of the time anymore. There are too many people who will happily undermine our claims if we try to. We can’t pretend what’s bad is good. We can’t change reputations when the evidence doesn’t support us.

Forget blackhat SEO, forget spam, forget cheating of all kinds – do what you want to do well and then help people communicate how good you are it. If you’re the Intercontinental Hotel and you want people to say how good you are – then stop charging for the WIFI and let customers tweet pics of their hotel rooms for free.

If you’re having to engage SEO experts to push you up the Google rankings then ask yourself why aren’t your customers doing this for you by talking about you online? A large part of SEO appears to be about trying to cheat a system based on genuinely trying to gauge just how popular you are. In the end, if you’re not popular then perhaps it’s not Google’s fault.

Let people spread the word.

Pssst…Vietnam… stop blocking Facebook.

Businesses don’t be dumb.  Buying Facebook or Twitter followers? Just how outrageously stupid is that? How does it make you look? Who are you fooling? You’re happy to have your brand associated with cheating?  Really?

When your product is ready invite others to try it, taste it, visit it – target those with their own platforms and following. New media, old media, social media, bloggers, tweeters and journalists. All those who shout the loudest to the most listeners. Real voices with real opinions.

Assist them by providing honest but, hopefully, entertaining content that they can link to or embed. Make the information they need easily available. Answer their questions. All their questions.

Be creative – stories, pics, movies. Use them to tell your story. Don’t worry too much about what platforms *you* use, create content that people can share on the platforms *they* use.

It’s time we learned that it’s the consumers that have all the power now. We can’t trick them any more.

More importantly of all, we can’t be seen to be trying to trick them either.


Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 65 other followers